The “policy of adaptation” the way forward for Bahraini democracy can be defined as the relationship or balance between the power of the state and the freedom of the individual. If so, a democratic system of government can take many forms. Bahrain has an excellent constitution that supports its phase of development, gives it a constitutional monarchy and an emerging parliamentary system, and in the last three parliaments has developed political conventions with fundamental, economic and social rights for its citizens. Great strides have been made over the past decade with respect to the Royal Reform Project and the Economic Vision 2030. In my view, the way forward lies in the accommodation policy. Each group will strive to work for the emancipation of its followers. Leaders who are strong in their positions can reach agreements and agreements, taking into account the interests of the nation first. Peaceful negotiations are the only way forward. The study of historical landmarks can support the process. With the help of existing institutions and national dialogue, Bahrain can achieve widely supported or unanimous solutions.

Similar appeals may involve other countries in the region, as the search for new and more flexible ways to consider different identities, integrate societies and enable the sharing of political power becomes inevitable. For this reason, an assessment of Lebanese sectarianism evokes some lessons that may be relevant to the region. The Lebanese experience can form the basis for a reflection on what can be applied elsewhere and, on the contrary, on what is best abandoned. Another obstacle to the adoption of a Lebanese-style sectarian solution is related to regional support for such a system. It was clear that Taf`s agreement could only work because it had an external regulator, Syria, which could enforce decisions through its rule. What power or power could finally emerge to guarantee peace in Syria? Or Iraq, Yemen and Bahrain? To what extent would external powers be accepted and respected, and for how long? The current crisis in Lebanon is largely due to the absence of a regulator, a reminder of the limits of its constantly patched up system. In accordance with the agreement, the principle of mutual coexistence between the different Lebanese sects and their “adequate political representation” became the main objective of the Lebanese law on parliamentary elections after the civil war. Since 1995, various proposals have been discussed, but they lack a clear distinction between central government and decentralized units. .